Posted by Bubba on September 13, 2000 at 14:09:47:
In Reply to: Does it? I see a Battlerager getting rid of an Emperor mage... (oh yes there's text) posted by The First Apostle on September 13, 2000 at 11:00:35:
> On some level there is a matter of priorities here.
>
> In front of the rager we are presented with an imperial
> magus who happens to be the emperor. Next to the leader
> of Masters who might you consider a larger threat... the
> Emperor magus or the Maran priest who *may* be carrying
> some magical items.
>
> Nepenthe comments lower about Ragers getting a "bully"
> mentality. If I were a rager, I'd want to first and foremost
> get rid of the PRACTIONERS of magic. Items can always be
> destroyed but it's the PRACTIONERS who carry on the art.
>
> Of course, we'd rather focus our energies in killing those
> arbiters who "protect" mages.. the Servants who "protect
> mages.. and the Maran priest who may have a couple of magic
> flags on the items he carries. With this many enemies, does
> Battle ever expect to win?
>
>
> It never ceases to amaze me that we try to promote players
> who think for themselves, but we always hold them up to
> some sort of cookie cutter standard.