Posted by Riebold on September 13, 2000 at 19:53:21:
In Reply to: Ok they kill the Emperor, then they should go right after the Paladin with the magic Headress, but as always they just ignore casting items on allies. n/t posted by Bubba on September 13, 2000 at 14:09:47:
I didnt die here, although I did have to fall back.
Balrahd and other paladins often gangbang with ragers and its just something that I basically accept and say touche, if I get the chance I'll do the same, its all just part of the game.
Now the magic helmet is poor yes, but I digress here and point to the fact that Ragers believe it or not do not always look at those that are supposed to be their friends.
Why? Because lets face it they love having the paladins help them and it is a pain in the ass to continually look at someone to see if they are wearing something magical.
Hell if he had charred bracers in theory they should kill him.
Good ambush, damned students of Thrym threw us off a good way leaving us wide open for it.
> > On some level there is a matter of priorities here.
> >
> > In front of the rager we are presented with an imperial
> > magus who happens to be the emperor. Next to the leader
> > of Masters who might you consider a larger threat... the
> > Emperor magus or the Maran priest who *may* be carrying
> > some magical items.
> >
> > Nepenthe comments lower about Ragers getting a "bully"
> > mentality. If I were a rager, I'd want to first and foremost
> > get rid of the PRACTIONERS of magic. Items can always be
> > destroyed but it's the PRACTIONERS who carry on the art.
> >
> > Of course, we'd rather focus our energies in killing those
> > arbiters who "protect" mages.. the Servants who "protect
> > mages.. and the Maran priest who may have a couple of magic
> > flags on the items he carries. With this many enemies, does
> > Battle ever expect to win?
> >
> >
> > It never ceases to amaze me that we try to promote players
> > who think for themselves, but we always hold them up to
> > some sort of cookie cutter standard.