Re: Aw. (reply asking for answers enclosed):

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Asha(IMM) on September 15, 2000 at 13:53:55:

In Reply to: Re: Aw. (reply asking for answers enclosed) posted by The Master from before on September 15, 2000 at 13:14:30:


> The fact was that I was there for one of the earlier contacts a week ago. After that I spent 6 hours running around trying to find out more information about it and came up with nothing.

Some information is really only going to be available through other PCs. Whether or not you're able to find the right ones and whether or not they're willing to tell you anything is another story. There are some very compelling reasons for certain sides to not share information with each other. I've made definite efforts to catch people up who are behind and to make more of the past information available, but I can't play 24/7.

> Anyway, sorry I got angry. Makes me angry when I try really hard then basically get told it's obvious I'm not.

It's obvious some people are not. Luck of the draw who's around when something happens. Part of being in a cabal is that, yes, other people can drop the ball for you. . .both in raids and otherwise. On three non-consecutive occasions an NPC the "in" crowd at the time for the quest in Troupe has been madly trying to find for weeks has surfaced with only completely uninvolved members of their cabal around. Not only have they tended to roll with that, but the then-uninvolved characters have tended to get right into the thick of things after those incidents. That just doesn't happen with Master. Maybe induction requirements are too easy.

Some new beginnings and some shorter quests in the future. Promise.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]