Re: No SseanN

Re: No SseanN:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Apache093 on October 10, 2000 at 09:28:02:

In Reply to: No SseanN posted by Imbrogno(VIP) on October 10, 2000 at 08:01:07:

[skipped]

> The way the arbiters acted all of them should've been corpses. That was the sorriest display of a 6-on-1(3pks and 6 guards counted as .5 each) that I've seen for awhile. I don't know where to start with them, so I left it as an open ended display of boggling and dismay.

6 vs 1? How about swirling mass. How about cabal healer. ;) How about that it wasnt for even a moment that all the three arbiters came in to fight.

Follow Ups:

Well Imbrogno(VIP) 13:46:05 10/10/2000 (2)
- You're like a poor man's Challen - full of righteous suggestions if what people could have done better (when you weren't all that great). At least he manages usually know what he's talking about, though. n/t *boggle* 22:10:33 10/10/2000 (0)
- Not the best ideas, but better than what they executed. However, you can't hit what you can't see. n/t Feirshay 16:39:53 10/10/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> [skipped] > > > The way the arbiters acted all of them should've been corpses. That was the sorriest display of a 6-on-1(3pks and 6 guards counted as .5 each) that I've seen for awhile. I don't know where to start with them, so I left it as an open ended display of boggling and dismay. > > 6 vs 1? How about swirling mass. How about cabal healer. ;) How about that it wasnt for even a moment that all the three arbiters came in to fight.