The best strategy here would have been to not have attacked in the first place. n/t

The best strategy here would have been to not have attacked in the first place. n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Stoneybalogna on December 11, 2000 at 09:39:42:

In Reply to: basically that was one messy group to focus on for primary posted by Graham on December 11, 2000 at 05:25:57:

> Thief can tank well (maces) if attacked first
> Thief can blackjack/knife/circle if not attacked
>
> Transmuter might drop like a stone if attacked
> Transmuter can halt/fumble/slow/soften if not attacked
>
> Conjurer can tank well if attacked
> Conjurer does stupid damage even if he's not attacked
>
> So all 3 makes a messy choice who to try and take down first (ie swiftly and negate from the fight)
> My best bet would be to hit thief and cranial transmuter or vice versa.... (of course if they didn't have prepare time then it'd be a different story again...cue ceaseless ramble)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Follow Ups:

Amen. Durgymp 20:10:12 12/11/2000 (1)
- chicken.. n/t Graham 03:34:59 12/12/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Thief can tank well (maces) if attacked first > > Thief can blackjack/knife/circle if not attacked > > > > Transmuter might drop like a stone if attacked > > Transmuter can halt/fumble/slow/soften if not attacked > > > > Conjurer can tank well if attacked > > Conjurer does stupid damage even if he's not attacked > > > > So all 3 makes a messy choice who to try and take down first (ie swiftly and negate from the fight) > > My best bet would be to hit thief and cranial transmuter or vice versa.... (of course if they didn't have prepare time then it'd be a different story again...cue ceaseless ramble) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >