Posted by Jafel on December 30, 2000 at 17:30:53:
In Reply to: Um, ok. posted by The Arcane(VIP) on December 30, 2000 at 16:57:58:
> > It was a baseless assumption
Perhaps, but that is not my point..
> > by someone I could really care less for.
Heh. Sorry.
>
This is not about liches, I never claimed it to be about liches. You said so and so is better than xxx.
I know, and I know what it is too. *poke* no this is not a threat I just know what it is.
>
> You can think that if you like. Anyone who knows what I'm talking about will disagree with you. Valguarnera would likely disagree with you as well, actually.
>
>
> Damn, and here I thought I'd found a new friend.
> > Given he is skilled, knowledgable.. and all that jazz. But does that necessarily make him the be all end all authority on everything.
>
> Did I say it did? No. I just said I have information and knowledge that you do not, and that leads me to a different conclusion than yours.
>
> > He seems to think so.
>
> No. I seem to think that I know more about liches than you do, and that you're wrong. You obviously disagree, and since I can't explain precisely why I'm right, I'm not going to convince you.
While it may or may not be true, what makes you think you know? From one situation? If I remember, you quit playing right.. so how would you know. So what your saying is from one log you can determine all this. Maybe the death squad got lucky, maybe Val made a mistake but does this make someone better than another?
Either way, who cares who is better.. and I will end this now.
>
> > I tend to agree with the people who called him an arrogant prick as he has pointed out recently.
>
> You're entitled to your opinion.
>
> > Despite his "unusual IP" he is so proud of.
>
> Huh? All I meant by that comment is that I have a static IP, unlike ABCDEF.ipt.aol.com or whatever. My IP is in the form myname.student.myschool.edu, so it's a pretty unique identifier.
>