Agreed (text)

Agreed (text):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Queen of all Media on February 1, 2000 at 11:47:49:

In Reply to: You know, Khiravn, I like you, but.. posted by Defender of Law on February 1, 2000 at 11:36:30:

For the same reasons defender brought up, there cannot be any Lawful people in the Battle Cabal. If what Khiravn says is true, you could not cabal if you were not lawful. (Lawful: ie adhering to the laws of the Cabal - Chaotic: doing whatever the hell you want) <- exception here is the Entropy Cabal.

If Khiravn's version of 'Lawful' were true, Battle members could be lawful, follow the laws of the cabal, and attack in cities. Which - just can't happen.

Follow Ups:

First: Khiravn 18:58:48 2/1/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> For the same reasons defender brought up, there cannot be any Lawful people in the Battle Cabal. If what Khiravn says is true, you could not cabal if you were not lawful. (Lawful: ie adhering to the laws of the Cabal - Chaotic: doing whatever the hell you want) <- exception here is the Entropy Cabal. > If Khiravn's version of 'Lawful' were true, Battle members could be lawful, follow the laws of the cabal, and attack in cities. Which - just can't happen.