Re: AC on body wear is multiplied by three when you wear it, in case you didn't notice (nt)

Re: AC on body wear is multiplied by three when you wear it, in case you didn't notice (nt):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Rune(VIP) on January 6, 2000 at 004:40:11:

In Reply to: Rings Vs. Plate posted by Cassman on January 6, 2000 at 000:27:43:

> I have always wondered why someone naked could stand more than a few blows, while fighting someone armored. slash/slash/dead.

> I completely aggree with you that a ring shouldn't have better AC than plate. *BUT* Seeing as this is fantasy, and most everything here is in some way magical (sorry Ragers, maybe mystical is better?), not everything would need a fix. Maybe bump Plates/Torso stuff up just a smidge, but you wouldn't have to have every IMM working EQ every second of everyday until 2002...

> Well ?

Follow Ups:

Rings,Amulets ect Vs. Armor Bacrie 006:20:58 1/6/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I have always wondered why someone naked could stand more than a few blows, while fighting someone armored. slash/slash/dead. > > I completely aggree with you that a ring shouldn't have better AC than plate. BUT Seeing as this is fantasy, and most everything here is in some way magical (sorry Ragers, maybe mystical is better?), not everything would need a fix. Maybe bump Plates/Torso stuff up just a smidge, but you wouldn't have to have every IMM working EQ every second of everyday until 2002... > > Well ?