Re: But still ...

Re: But still ...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Vex on January 21, 2000 at 00:10:06:

In Reply to: But still ... posted by Joshu on January 20, 2000 at 09:56:49:

> > I hate to disappoint you, but Liches are virtually no different than they have been since implementation. Everything else in your post is correct, however.

> Isn't it true that a big part of the strategy that felled Istendil in the 40 round 11 man gangbang that time, would now be unusable. And thus if that happened today, I doubt Istendil would die from that encounter. So liches are not completely the same.

> -Joshu

If I recall correctly, didn't Nep purposely lose that fight of which your referring?

Vex

Follow Ups:

Re: But still ... Nepenthe(IMM) 12:53:04 1/21/2000 (0)
Re: Nah ... but you are partly correct Zendrac 02:29:01 1/21/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > I hate to disappoint you, but Liches are virtually no different than they have been since implementation. Everything else in your post is correct, however. > > Isn't it true that a big part of the strategy that felled Istendil in the 40 round 11 man gangbang that time, would now be unusable. And thus if that happened today, I doubt Istendil would die from that encounter. So liches are not completely the same. > > -Joshu > If I recall correctly, didn't Nep purposely lose that fight of which your referring? > Vex