To Point 5, I played Masters to play the Studious mage/explorer, not to Hack down Trees. They were made more war like, and reduced in Power. NT

To Point 5, I played Masters to play the Studious mage/explorer, not to Hack down Trees. They were made more war like, and reduced in Power. NT:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by OLD Master. on February 1, 2000 at 18:40:05:

In Reply to: 5 Points. posted by Ven on February 1, 2000 at 18:10:45:

> > > !

> > > > P.S. SO they Have conjureres now, I'd rather have the AP's Back.

> > > I take it you haven't experienced conjurers yet?

> 1. Conjurers kick ass. However, they are generally considered boring.

> 2. Mana Transfer + Conjurers = Bastardly cheap trick.

> 3. Masters have not been "Pussified", maybe if there were any around you would see this.

> 4. Of course someone like the Arcane could make an Imperial mage and whomp on all of the Masters if he wanted but I don't think Empire's powers are better.

> 5. If you truly do think so, make an Imperial. Your post reveals the fact that you aren't playing Masters for the rp.

> Ven

Follow Ups:

Re: Ye of little faith and knowledge Saerin 10:20:56 2/2/2000 (2)
- thanks... Ven 17:24:22 2/2/2000 (0)
- Re: Ye of little faith and knowledge Yupa 12:13:22 2/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > ! > > > > > P.S. SO they Have conjureres now, I'd rather have the AP's Back. > > > > I take it you haven't experienced conjurers yet? > > 1. Conjurers kick ass. However, they are generally considered boring. > > 2. Mana Transfer + Conjurers = Bastardly cheap trick. > > 3. Masters have not been "Pussified", maybe if there were any around you would see this. > > 4. Of course someone like the Arcane could make an Imperial mage and whomp on all of the Masters if he wanted but I don't think Empire's powers are better. > > 5. If you truly do think so, make an Imperial. Your post reveals the fact that you aren't playing Masters for the rp. > > Ven