Arbiters are law. Without arbiters there is truly no law. (this should be adopted by Empire so that they don't have a disadvantage because of the disband.)

Arbiters are law. Without arbiters there is truly no law. (this should be adopted by Empire so that they don't have a disadvantage because of the disband.):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Tat on February 10, 2000 at 10:53:47:

In Reply to: Yes (text) posted by Pug on February 10, 2000 at 08:29:01:

> Few points:

> 1. Before disbanding arbiters, CF was mainly evil. After, it is mainly evil chaotic. Lack of diversity is obvious. (maybe it's just the time I play though)
> 2. What's the point of having law and not having enforcers?
> 3. Quite a few people say that being wanted is a bugger, and reduces fun. Haven't you ever thought of a chance to drive like they do in action films (breaking every rule, causing massive destruction, etc), but stopped because of possible consequences? There can be quite a few examples like that.
> 4. One thing Arbiters lacked: corruption. If they are reinstated, they should be more tolerant to corruption, and it should be dealt with on mortal level.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Few points: > > 1. Before disbanding arbiters, CF was mainly evil. After, it is mainly evil chaotic. Lack of diversity is obvious. (maybe it's just the time I play though) > > 2. What's the point of having law and not having enforcers? > > 3. Quite a few people say that being wanted is a bugger, and reduces fun. Haven't you ever thought of a chance to drive like they do in action films (breaking every rule, causing massive destruction, etc), but stopped because of possible consequences? There can be quite a few examples like that. > > 4. One thing Arbiters lacked: corruption. If they are reinstated, they should be more tolerant to corruption, and it should be dealt with on mortal level.