Erm you do know that Knights did exist though right ? As a cabal .... Just checking is all n/t :

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Asa on February 11, 2000 at 16:41:45:

In Reply to: Why KNIGHTS doesnt suck, but wont be re implemented as a cabal posted by Arkteri on February 11, 2000 at 05:35:54:

> Hey, I been playing CF for 6 months or so, and
> the Knights cabal is before my time. However,
> there seems to be much talk going around and
> here I how I interpret Knighthood .. Knights
> first of all, are living and feeding on HONOR.
> A moral codex, that influeces all of their
> actions, in battle, in clothings, how they
> deal with other people etc. Neither
> paladins or anti-paladins cannot join the ranks
> of the Knights, since these too classes are too
> rooted in the good/evil conflict to proberly
> understand the concept of Honor. Knights should
> be the smallest and toughest underdog cabal
> in Thera, accepting only warriors and assassins.
> They will not loot corpses they didnt kill.
> They will not engage in spontanious battle unless
> attacked themself.
> They will not group with thiefs and might
> have problems functioning in groups in general.

> The question is, does these individuals fit into
> a cabal? As it is, Knights are not dead .. they
> just disbanded and the remaining few of these
> extrordinary individuals worship Cador. And thats
> prob the way it should be. Why? Becus, 1) there are
> too few of them to form a cabal 2) They will have
> a hard time fitting into the game 3) What
> will they contribute with? They wont fit into
> the classic CF conflict scenarios beteween
> good/evil, magic/nature, law/order, battle/magic ..

> Thats why KNIGHTS will not be re implemented as a
> cabal. You want to be a Knight? Go ahead, find
> Cador, and join the brotherhood. But .. forget
> the Knights Cabal idear.

>


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]