Some questions to the answers.:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Drex on March 23, 2000 at 10:33:22:

In Reply to: Some answers posted by Proud Blade on March 23, 2000 at 09:45:20:

> > Did I miss some disadvantage? Wouldn't just weapon resistance be proper?
>
> Yes, you did. Damroll reduction, slowed skill learning, no barrier for starters.

*** Who cares about learning in PK? What do you mean by barriers? ***

> > I mean, some races/classes should be able to change as they progress further in life, especially humans who are quite variable and so. Especially neutrals should be able to change alignments further on in life as they gain experience and such. Look at some fantasy books for example! Lord Ingtar changed alignment from good to evil, then back to good in Robert Jordan's books. I'm sure there's a lot other examples you can figure out.
>
> There are plenty of CF examples of this already, including one very interesting current character. See any odd titles?

*** Yup, but I also know there's a lot of people who lose skills/spells/weapon specialization etc. too. (The Oath) What do you think about that? Some people should have the right to change etho, don't you think ? ***

*** Thanks for the answers. ***

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]