*Trying not to post*

*Trying not to post*:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Khiravn on March 23, 2000 at 10:56:28:

In Reply to: >pokes Khiravn with a stick< posted by Passing Imperial on March 23, 2000 at 10:19:57:

No kidding. This'll be my last visit to the forum for a week, promise :)

I'm not the most informed. I've never played a rager that was actually inducted :P My experience with ragers has been limited to killing them (or running away with ease) or watching logs of people killing them (or running away with ease), with the occassional abberational exception (backstab/tripping gangbang).

This experience has led me to believe that it's hard for a rager to kill someone who knows what they're doing. So I don't expect them to run up against Zorszaul without a gangbang. Yeah, gangbanging a wimp is cheesy, but gangbanging is sometimes necessary if you want to kill someone in particular. I have played long enough to notice that everyone does it, and everyone accepts it. I have played long enough to notice that the worst violators of cheesy gangbangs on naked people are the ones that cry foul the most when they get gangbanged in return. I don't feel rager powers are particuarly overpowering in any way, given their extreme limitations, so I have no problem with ragers gangbanging. When I wrote that comment, I was, frankly, of the opinion that only an elite type of player could play a rager hero successfully that never gangbanged. I suppose there are some out there, but I've never run into them.

So, I don't know if I had a point in all this except that it would be nice to just once see a current rager hero say "None of us fight with courage, we do cheesy gangbangs too much" on the forum rather than read their victims whine about it. Because dying to someone and whining about them is nothing unusual. Any cabal could easily whine about any other cabal and how they don't live up to their standards (and do, often). It just doesn't carry as much weight as a cabal hero complaining about it (and roleyplaying his heart out to change it within the game).

Hmm.. All right, I'm going on my one week vacation from the forum now. I don't think my opinions on this are very valuable, anyway.

Khiravn.

Follow Ups:

answer. and do not set a precedance of leaving the forum...if I did that I would have nothing to do at work...(text) Grallon 11:16:59 3/23/2000 (5)
- Precedent. One sets a precedent. n/t Graatch (VIP)(Wearing his professional hat) 11:51:43 3/23/2000 (4)
  - You look silly with that hat on....take it off :P n/t DL 16:56:44 3/23/2000 (0)
  - spelling...that fits into the same category as grammer...rules...nt Grallon 12:06:18 3/23/2000 (2)
    - BTW it is spelled grammar, I believe. A smart-ass that purposely missed the intended ( I hope) sarcasm. 14:18:13 3/23/2000 (0)
    - No, grallon, it is not simply spelling. Precedence is an entirely different word than precedent. n/t Graatch, now new and improved as in teacher mode. 13:08:38 3/23/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> No kidding. This'll be my last visit to the forum for a week, promise :) > > I'm not the most informed. I've never played a rager that was actually inducted :P My experience with ragers has been limited to killing them (or running away with ease) or watching logs of people killing them (or running away with ease), with the occassional abberational exception (backstab/tripping gangbang). > > This experience has led me to believe that it's hard for a rager to kill someone who knows what they're doing. So I don't expect them to run up against Zorszaul without a gangbang. Yeah, gangbanging a wimp is cheesy, but gangbanging is sometimes necessary if you want to kill someone in particular. I have played long enough to notice that everyone does it, and everyone accepts it. I have played long enough to notice that the worst violators of cheesy gangbangs on naked people are the ones that cry foul the most when they get gangbanged in return. I don't feel rager powers are particuarly overpowering in any way, given their extreme limitations, so I have no problem with ragers gangbanging. When I wrote that comment, I was, frankly, of the opinion that only an elite type of player could play a rager hero successfully that never gangbanged. I suppose there are some out there, but I've never run into them. > > So, I don't know if I had a point in all this except that it would be nice to just once see a current rager hero say "None of us fight with courage, we do cheesy gangbangs too much" on the forum rather than read their victims whine about it. Because dying to someone and whining about them is nothing unusual. Any cabal could easily whine about any other cabal and how they don't live up to their standards (and do, often). It just doesn't carry as much weight as a cabal hero complaining about it (and roleyplaying his heart out to change it within the game). > > Hmm.. All right, I'm going on my one week vacation from the forum now. I don't think my opinions on this are very valuable, anyway. > > Khiravn.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]