Posted by matrim on April 4, 2000 at 17:10:32:
In Reply to: Interesting theory...care to elaborate? (n/t) posted by Shokai(IMM) on April 4, 2000 at 14:20:07:
> very curious to hear these reasons...
I rather liked the knights.
Dealing with empire, people who dont play the role of an imperial right *esp with their sphere* then they were made anathema.
I think i saw one knight once that was named cowardly ex-knight of thera, but only one.
The cabal role wasnt enforced. the leaders I believe saw it.. some of them, but never did anything, could they uninduct? or do something such as anathema?
there was an arial sword spec.. that kicked ass alot.. he was a follower and marked by andaren i believe...
he was a bloodied knight of thera for a bit.
he played the roll of a bloodthirsty anti-evil person, but almost never ganged. I remember 3 chars that fought against him of mine. one a ranger that was trying to be in battle. I went after him for him keeping attacking my groupmates and makeing them run.
hehe
another an arial sword spec warrior empirial.
that was a long fight, but he killed me
another a muter when we were wee people. what do you think with a warrior against a muter at about rank 13 - 15?
sucked being drow then
that was back when i was experimenting with races and such, and learning alot.
so dont fault me hehe.
anyway
why did he become a bloodied knight of thera if he didnt do the right things? or challen?
alot of the others did from what i saw, but hey, i dont see everything. i hear complaints and that is about it.
we could say the same of the ragers today of what the knights did then...
really could..
I dont know if he is saying you didnt enforce it by punishing those whom didnt rp the cabal right, but that is a part of what i am saying.
anyway. it is 3 am in the morning and what i am saying most likely isnt makeing sense to most of you.
anyway.
my 2 cents.