Posted by Rune(VIP) on April 12, 2000 at 14:35:23:
In Reply to: Uh, no. To both of you. n/t posted by Trell on April 12, 2000 at 10:44:42:
Well, since you don't seem to care to elaborate, I will. An old quote here from a past post by you:
Anyway, I said it before and I'll say it again, rager berserkers are over powered.
I know you had 30 or so deaths left in you, so fair enough, I was a bit off with my initial heading... My point was, that I find it quite funny, that you can claim that rager berserkers are overpowered after losing a third of your con at 30!? where they are supposedly the strongest in comparison to mages. No bash protection should make mages pretty easy to kill, and a duergar warrior doesn't exactly have a bad range.
> > > > I'm sick and tired of hearing that battles are over powered. So I want to issue this challenge. Role up a battle rager and post your name here. Rank the battle to hero level. If your name can pass into battle ledgend, then my hats goes of to you, and I'll be the first to take up the charge that battleragers are over powered. That should be no problem right? Since they are so over powered? *wink* If you die of old age (without the reputation of being a coward), then you've earned the right to complain as much as you like. But if you have done neither or never played a battle rager, then PLEASE stop complain because it's obvious that you have no idea what your talking about. After playing a rager I bet you'll say they get killed too easy.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for you time.