Posted by Past Arbiter on April 29, 2000 at 15:08:47:
In Reply to: or maybe they should actually play their rolled role.. (text) posted by Wonder Bunny II on April 29, 2000 at 14:47:25:
> If they're playing their good character as so lawful that they'd group with an evil, they should then be neutral. If they play a class that requires goodness (healer for certain supps, paladin) yet roleplay it as an evil-friendly char, they should be changed to neutral and e forced to quest to gain their supps back. If they're not, they should have either rolled neutral or be changed to neutral with affects similar to the bloodoath.
>
> Arbiters are examples of the shittiest RPing in CF, bar none, because for some reason this two-dimensionality is accepted. If this is taken as 'proper', so too should gnomes be able to be imperial mages, or storm giants imperial soldiers.
I agree with pretty much all of this (other than maybe they "Shittiest RPing in CF" part. That's me though.) What I meant was that unless their role forbade such interactions (a Lich and Maran grouping for any reason for example) two should be able to work together for a common goal like killing a criminal. Being "evil-friendly" is completely different that what I'd intended. Two opposites shouldn't go ranking together because they make a good team. Otherwise, I agree with your point of view.