So by your reasoning anyone having ever traveled with a Mage is fit for drestruction?N/T

So by your reasoning anyone having ever traveled with a Mage is fit for drestruction?N/T:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Perturbed again on May 30, 2000 at 08:05:10:

In Reply to: Re: Questions about the ragrers. posted by Desert Rose on May 30, 2000 at 07:27:46:

> Ragers are allegedly supposed to "respect" priests,
> so long as said priest is not caught using magic
> or travelling with mages. This, of course, gives the rager
> plenty of reasons to whack said priest. If you were to complain
> to him about it, I can almost gauran-damn-tee you that said Rager
> would reply that he'd seen you grouped with mages in the past or
> seen you carrying/using potions. Something. Make no mistake, ragers
> are corrupt. But more then likely, you have grouped with a mage, making
> his killing of you perfectly feasible. At least, thats my opinion.

Follow Ups:

Not my reasoning. The Village's Reasoning. N/t Desert Rose 10:14:16 5/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Ragers are allegedly supposed to "respect" priests, > > so long as said priest is not caught using magic > > or travelling with mages. This, of course, gives the rager > > plenty of reasons to whack said priest. If you were to complain > > to him about it, I can almost gauran-damn-tee you that said Rager > > would reply that he'd seen you grouped with mages in the past or > > seen you carrying/using potions. Something. Make no mistake, ragers > > are corrupt. But more then likely, you have grouped with a mage, making > > his killing of you perfectly feasible. At least, thats my opinion.