Not my reasoning. The Village's Reasoning. N/t

Not my reasoning. The Village's Reasoning. N/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Desert Rose on May 30, 2000 at 10:14:16:

In Reply to: So by your reasoning anyone having ever traveled with a Mage is fit for drestruction?N/T posted by Perturbed again on May 30, 2000 at 08:05:10:

> > Ragers are allegedly supposed to "respect" priests,
> > so long as said priest is not caught using magic
> > or travelling with mages. This, of course, gives the rager
> > plenty of reasons to whack said priest. If you were to complain
> > to him about it, I can almost gauran-damn-tee you that said Rager
> > would reply that he'd seen you grouped with mages in the past or
> > seen you carrying/using potions. Something. Make no mistake, ragers
> > are corrupt. But more then likely, you have grouped with a mage, making
> > his killing of you perfectly feasible. At least, thats my opinion.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Ragers are allegedly supposed to "respect" priests, > > > so long as said priest is not caught using magic > > > or travelling with mages. This, of course, gives the rager > > > plenty of reasons to whack said priest. If you were to complain > > > to him about it, I can almost gauran-damn-tee you that said Rager > > > would reply that he'd seen you grouped with mages in the past or > > > seen you carrying/using potions. Something. Make no mistake, ragers > > > are corrupt. But more then likely, you have grouped with a mage, making > > > his killing of you perfectly feasible. At least, thats my opinion.