Posted by Quintius on June 7, 2000 at 12:06:06:
In Reply to: alright. posted by Forum Reader on June 7, 2000 at 11:24:42:
> That's granted, but considering the situation. It's not like the Ragers took the item
> once and left it alone. They've gone out of their way to decimate your cabal and it's
> members. I could argue IC that the arbiters need to regain control of the law and the
> protected cities, and the only way to do this is to take the war to the Ragers. When
> the situation is extreme and necessary, shouldn't declared war by the arbiter leadership
> be an option?
It is and you're preaching to the choir on this point. :P
> This is where the potential abuse potential really is. Why not get rid of the exp loss caused by special
> guards? It's difficult to come up with an IC explanation for exp loss due to being wanted.
I think the point is that when you are punished for a crime, it's supposed to hurt, that is, punishment HAS to hurt or it's not punishment.
> It makes sense, but when the extreme occurs what do you do? Wait and hope the Masters get a backbone or the Imperials
> re-group, get a council and actually take the emperor's items? In the meantime, the arbiter cabal suffers, and they
> already have Zors to deal with.
Again, you're preaching to the choir.
Something will be done.
-Quint.