Re: Yes, but..

Re: Yes, but..:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Billy Rubin on June 23, 2000 at 21:54:14:

In Reply to: Yes, but.. posted by Jafel on June 22, 2000 at 17:40:01:

thanks for the lecture on zones and binding ip addresses to domain names...How can SWBell not call their ADSL a dedicated line? Are you telling me that there is a 2 hour disconnect ( as I have seen with non-dedicated ADSL lines here in MN). I don't think so. And there has to be SOME IP address mapped in their tables - although I am unfamiliar with the dynamics associated with mapping a dynamic IP address to a hostname. I understand all the tech underneath what we are discussing, I am just not familiar with how SWBell has chosen to implement it for CF.

Follow Ups:

*sigh* Jafel 02:23:15 6/24/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> thanks for the lecture on zones and binding ip addresses to domain names...How can SWBell not call their ADSL a dedicated line? Are you telling me that there is a 2 hour disconnect ( as I have seen with non-dedicated ADSL lines here in MN). I don't think so. And there has to be SOME IP address mapped in their tables - although I am unfamiliar with the dynamics associated with mapping a dynamic IP address to a hostname. I understand all the tech underneath what we are discussing, I am just not familiar with how SWBell has chosen to implement it for CF.