4) Also throw up different types of weapons (using hands you are not gonna disarm polearms very well). (n/t)

4) Also throw up different types of weapons (using hands you are not gonna disarm polearms very well). (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Swist on July 1, 2000 at 18:40:40:

In Reply to: Here is my theory posted by Daishan(VIP) on July 1, 2000 at 16:17:50:

> I think that disarm is very much like the defensive skills that one has.

> For example if you are an assassin and a warrior comes at you with a mace or axe or polearm, you arent going to be very evasive, because you dont know how those weapons work.

> So I think that disarm and defending against disarms works on three differant variables...

> 1. How well you know your weapon.

> 2. How well you know your opponents weapons.

> 3. And proficient you are at disarming.

> Of course, I could be 100% wrong on all of this.

> this is just what I think

Follow Ups:

I dunno, I think I could disarm a big long pole with my hands easier than with a sword or dagger... Koe 19:55:08 7/2/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I think that disarm is very much like the defensive skills that one has. > > For example if you are an assassin and a warrior comes at you with a mace or axe or polearm, you arent going to be very evasive, because you dont know how those weapons work. > > So I think that disarm and defending against disarms works on three differant variables... > > 1. How well you know your weapon. > > 2. How well you know your opponents weapons. > > 3. And proficient you are at disarming. > > Of course, I could be 100% wrong on all of this. > > this is just what I think