I don't know what I just read but the reply above has nothing to do with your post above it. I can see your point with the Bard Analogy. N/T

I don't know what I just read but the reply above has nothing to do with your post above it. I can see your point with the Bard Analogy. N/T:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Eric Prothero on July 8, 2000 at 15:04:23:

In Reply to: Your sorta makig my point here... posted by Eric Prothero on July 8, 2000 at 14:31:01:

> It is a punishment for the Player not the character.

> This keeps a "safe zone" for the rest of the players to bring their characters.

> It does not matter who the hcaracter is the Law apllies equally to all.

> If you break the laws in this Area your character is going to suffer. Players don't want this to happen for the most part so they generaly avoid doing it.

> Even if they have an IC reason for doing it they the Player are still having to cope with these rules.

> This is why for the most part ragers aren't waltzing into Town at the Mid ranks and raping the Guildguards to get at the creamy middle.

> Pro
> FTA

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > It is a punishment for the Player not the character. > > This keeps a "safe zone" for the rest of the players to bring their characters. > > It does not matter who the hcaracter is the Law apllies equally to all. > > If you break the laws in this Area your character is going to suffer. Players don't want this to happen for the most part so they generaly avoid doing it. > > Even if they have an IC reason for doing it they the Player are still having to cope with these rules. > > This is why for the most part ragers aren't waltzing into Town at the Mid ranks and raping the Guildguards to get at the creamy middle. > > Pro > > FTA