Posted by Dyston on July 12, 2000 at 16:29:42:

In Reply to: The issue I have with this... posted by DL on July 12, 2000 at 16:09:20:

> Knowing full well that the FoN is in the past, and that's it's future is in broad daylight as the Ashes of Nowhere.

There is the idea that the future can be changed. Protecting the past is really a roleplaying
choice. Since the void provides that access to some Warders it may be worth a try.

> Is it still worth trying to protect? If you change the past...(kill tulpebb and the burners enough times or something) could the ashes revert back to FoN?

I think it can be. It's not "required". It depends on your character's take.

> But since it is the past is it, by definition, unchangeable.

Depends on which Star Trek theory you're listening to this week. ;)

> Or does sylvan not really care about it that much and say, "We protect any forest, any time-period"

As I stated above, I think it's left to the individual. I could have
easily stated as you have, and I imagine Sebeok wouldn't have booted
my ass. If your character believes in the "here and now", I can't see
why you'd waste time protecting the past.

> I don't know just some thoughts to toss out there

> enjoy,
> DL

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup