Posted by DL on July 12, 2000 at 16:09:20:

In Reply to: the idiocy of a sylvan (Log board is down so posting here) posted by Lifraul on July 12, 2000 at 15:36:00:

Knowing full well that the FoN is in the past, and that's it's future is in broad daylight as the Ashes of Nowhere.

Is it still worth trying to protect? If you change the past...(kill tulpebb and the burners enough times or something) could the ashes revert back to FoN?

But since it is the past is it, by definition, unchangeable.

Or does sylvan not really care about it that much and say, "We protect any forest, any time-period"

I don't know just some thoughts to toss out there

enjoy,
DL

Follow Ups:

• I gots news, DL.... the past is only unchangeable by definition given the assumption that you can't travel back in time. Hate to poke holes in your awesome theory like that, but... n/t Macheath 17:39:53 7/12/2000 (4)
  • One school of thought states that the past is unchangable, because anything you do in the past has already been done, aka predestination. That's how I see CF's 'past' - either that, or pretend it's an illusion. (n/t) Malebolgia 18:35:20 7/12/2000 (2)
    • The other school wonders... Albert Eensteen 19:42:54 7/12/2000 (1)
      • SON of a bitch, not SUN of a bitch, you dolt. (n/t) Malebolgia 20:01:00 7/12/2000 (0)
  • I wouldn't call that an awesome theory...but thanks Mac the Knife n/t DL 18:07:29 7/12/2000 (0)
• My take... Dyston 16:29:42 7/12/2000 (0)
• If you did your mother in the fon, and she go pg with you, would you be your dad? (nt) But... 16:12:20 7/12/2000 (0)

Post a Followup