Re: The type of character you are interested in is apparent here...

Re: The type of character you are interested in is apparent here...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by theidiot on July 19, 2000 at 23:15:29:

In Reply to: Re: The type of character you are interested in is apparent here... posted by Ranger Neophyte on July 19, 2000 at 21:25:33:

> I agree that ranger skills should not be so lightly dismissed. But the xp penalty is also quite bogus. Make all non-human races have 200 xp penalty (h-e could stay at 100) and remove all class based xp penalties. My $0.02.

> Speaking of rangers, I would vote to nix the staves and scrolls bit. What woodsman has time for that stuff? In compensation move 3rd attack to lvl 20 or such.

How about giving them 2 more staff specs and giving a non felar a reason to use one.
oops.

sweep -
The ranger jabs the end of the staff between the feet of his opponent and sweeps his feet out from underneath him.

overhead -
Cranial :) :)

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I agree that ranger skills should not be so lightly dismissed. But the xp penalty is also quite bogus. Make all non-human races have 200 xp penalty (h-e could stay at 100) and remove all class based xp penalties. My $0.02. > > Speaking of rangers, I would vote to nix the staves and scrolls bit. What woodsman has time for that stuff? In compensation move 3rd attack to lvl 20 or such. > How about giving them 2 more staff specs and giving a non felar a reason to use one. > oops. > sweep - > The ranger jabs the end of the staff between the feet of his opponent and sweeps his feet out from underneath him. > overhead - > Cranial :) :)