Posted by Blik on July 30, 2000 at 15:25:28:

First of all, I thought the entire scene was nicely roleplayed. But IC, there was NO basis to convict at all.
Blik thinks Trasthe was motivated by:
1)Pride. He wanted to be the first arbiter to convict a conjurer for his monkey stealing in town, an act which annoys everyone.
2)Greed. He desired the much-mana-giving alligator-skinned whip Blik carried.

The proof, you ask? None. No evidence. Nothing was stolen, there were no witnesses, no one actually saw the alleged monkey except the accuser, Blik had never committed a crime, was not chaotic, nor stupid. Why would he steal with Grislan, the arbiter lord, AND Trasthe sitting in town?

Was all fun, though. Besides losing my bleedin' whip. :P

Follow Ups:

• Text. vighmohd 15:50:41 7/30/2000 (11)
  • If Trasthe was discredited, it was IC, not OOC, so your (lil text) IC 17:12:10 7/30/2000 (4)
    • Entragin You've obviously never played an arbiter. You're absolutely wrong, but I'll not go into the countless reasons why.(n/t) 22:27:40 7/30/2000 (0)
    • How the hell do you consider char assassination on the forum IC discrediting? N/T Vighmohd 20:05:05 7/30/2000 (2)
      • surmising Trasthe's IC motives is all I saw Blik say..character assassination? stay off the pills, V.. bah a crazed old woman 20:57:19 7/30/2000 (1)
        • Hey, dont knock my pills man N/T Vighmohd 04:54:06 7/31/2000 (0)
  • Re: Text. Magtograme 16:17:10 7/30/2000 (5)
    • I'll say this: Chalupah 16:38:53 7/30/2000 (4)
      • Re: I'll say this: Magtograme/Jachyra 20:58:42 7/30/2000 (3)
        • Burden of Proof [txt] Trasthe 21:06:57 7/30/2000 (2)
          • Small Text, please read. Clemmy, Player of Coutnless Elders, (and even one Lord Arbiter) 01:21:10 7/31/2000 (0)
          • Re: Burden of Proof [txt] Magtograme 21:12:01 7/30/2000 (0)
• Re: BLECH -Wrongful conviction (some text) Zurhnile 15:31:39 7/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup