Posted by Kinda annoyed on August 18, 2000 at 16:19:47:

It seems that every rager is a berserker.
My idea is this.
Get rid of the Rager 'sect' thing (Scouts,
Defenders, and Berserkers) and make
them exactly like they used to be.
It's only fair.

Since none of the leaders reinforce the policy
of having equal numbers of types of ragers,
either punish them or ENFORCE the damned thing
and make it worth while!

Follow Ups:

• By definition, a The Arcane(VIP) 17:19:47 8/18/2000 (8)
  • rager is a berserker N/T There! 17:30:45 8/18/2000 (5)
    • More along the lines of implying that the post failed to meet the definition of a The Arcane(VIP) 18:39:50 8/18/2000 (4)
      • What the hell...? a The Arcane(VIP) 18:44:02 8/18/2000 (3)
        • Ok, that's a bug... the definition of a though (with quotation marks around it) [text for Dio] The Arcane(VIP) 18:45:25 8/18/2000 (2)
          • Re: Ok, that's a bug... the definition of a though (with quotation marks around it) [text for Dio] Dioxide(VIP) 23:35:44 8/18/2000 (0)
          • (test subj) Is it only for VIPs? (test)... "vips" 'vips' %vips% etc. (n/t) Zepachu 23:34:27 8/18/2000 (0)
  • Odd, dunno why my subject got truncated. Ah well, it wasn't that witty anyway. (n/t) The Arcane(VIP) 17:21:44 8/18/2000 (1)
    • *coughs* Did you put a less than sign in it? ...Just a guess for future reference. (n/t) Zepachu 17:54:42 8/18/2000 (0)
• Or might not Nepenthe(IMM) 16:24:34 8/18/2000 (0)
• some thoughts Daishan(VIP) 16:23:23 8/18/2000 (0)

Post a Followup