Re: Save vs Spell, my experiences:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Not An Immortal(VIP) on August 24, 2000 at 07:24:31:

In Reply to: Re: Save vs Spell, my experiences posted by Daryl(VIP) on August 24, 2000 at 01:53:14:

> Save vs Spells aren't going to help you much on CF unless you're a rager with spellbane, in my opinion. 20hp or -5 vs spells? Definitely go for the hp's. Magic can really thrash non-spellbaning warriors, even if they have good saves. Go for the hp's. 60hp and mana are better than -20 saves.

I guess that depends on what kind of character you play. My current druid usually hovers around -65 save vs spell (just about all of it is fairly common or non-lim items), and without it, I'd go down the first time somebody felt like burning 5 mana on a blindness spell. With my current saves, I can feel pretty confident when going toe-to-toe with a necro of similar rank.

As long as you don't have a really high damroll, your -saves do help (High damrolls kill your saves). So you definitely need to decide which is more important. -Saves and +hp have always been my first priority.



Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]