Re: Save vs Spell, my experiences

Re: Save vs Spell, my experiences:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Daryl(VIP) on August 24, 2000 at 01:53:14:

In Reply to: Save vs Spell posted by Wondering on August 24, 2000 at 00:24:59:

Save vs Spells aren't going to help you much on CF unless you're a rager with spellbane, in my opinion. 20hp or -5 vs spells? Definitely go for the hp's. Magic can really thrash non-spellbaning warriors, even if they have good saves. Go for the hp's. 60hp and mana are better than -20 saves.

On a side note, save vs paralysis is something I've always looked at a lot more closely than save vs spells, and I always try to keep as much of vs. paralysis as possible.

Follow Ups:

Re: Save vs Spell, my experiences Not An Immortal(VIP) 07:24:31 8/24/2000 (5)
- not with everybody Graham 08:18:07 8/24/2000 (4)
  - Care to elaborate? (nt) Not An Immortal(VIP) 08:27:02 8/24/2000 (3)
    - those with enhanced damage Graham 12:38:45 8/24/2000 (2)
      - Enhanced damage has absolutely nothing to do with your damroll(nt) Not An Immortal(VIP) 20:09:43 8/24/2000 (1)
        
        ok i'll be less brief and actually explain my thinking Graham 03:26:19 8/25/2000 (0)
i'm glad your a VIP Graham 03:01:12 8/24/2000 (0)
wondering Animal 02:38:05 8/24/2000 (1)
- Save spell helps on sleep, save paralysis helps on hold/halt. That's it (nt) Rune(VIP) 03:49:15 8/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Save vs Spells aren't going to help you much on CF unless you're a rager with spellbane, in my opinion. 20hp or -5 vs spells? Definitely go for the hp's. Magic can really thrash non-spellbaning warriors, even if they have good saves. Go for the hp's. 60hp and mana are better than -20 saves. > On a side note, save vs paralysis is something I've always looked at a lot more closely than save vs spells, and I always try to keep as much of vs. paralysis as possible.