Ok you said my post was wrong yet, you wrote the same.... and ac does substract dammage, try fighting 200 diference in ac and then come post the results.:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by PINI on August 24, 2000 at 18:09:18:

In Reply to: Re: Save vs Spell posted by Not An Immortal(VIP) on August 24, 2000 at 08:24:26:

>
> > Save vs spell is the same as armor class, it reduces the amount of dammage dealt to you by a spell, or magical weapon.

> > It doesnt make a big diference, for instance lets say a nova will make you 500dam and you have about 50svs then the nova will make about 466dam. (just example, not exact numbers)

>
> Um... no, I'm sorry but that is completely wrong. Without giving away the specific numbers of how it works, each point of -save gives you a percentage chance to either completely ignore a magical attack (such as sleep, blindness, etc), or to take half damage (all damage spells).

> so, having -30 spells might give you like a 50% chance to resist or ignore damage from a spellcaster of your same rank. You will gain a penalty from casters who are higher level than yourself.

> Of course, that 50% is just made up, and not the true value, but it illustrates that -save gear is not just like AC. The exact numbers aren't important, just know that if you want to take on spellcasters, -save gear is crucial.

> P.S. I might add, that AC does not subtract from damage either. I don't know where that came from. The only way to subtract from damage is to employ one of the multitude of resisting spells/wands/objects/skills.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]