Posted by Graham on August 29, 2000 at 11:46:23:

ok don't flame don't bitch and fucking argue no idea can be right or wrong so don't go bitching about them - just state your ideas. If you have any then represent, if you don't, shut up fool!

--To hook people Cf needs to be more of a fantasy adventure than a game.
Rich background.
Different races.
Different cultures amongst races.
Real differences between races (not just stats).
Consistency...

--Emote function (as with stand/rest/sleep) for drink,eat,cardinal directions (not emote for arriving, just leaving) and casting (most difficult to implement).

--Cabals more choosy (other than empire/dawn) therefore more uncaballeds running around and those caballed better represent the ideals of the cabal (more hardcore).

--Reduce cabal membership to approx 10-20% of Thera (As many bloodoath as you wish, but not imperial)

--Age more relevant, so those elves can be leisurely in the way they do things but arials cannot. No more grummores.....

--Make fights longer - mulitply damage by 0.9 (or 0.8)

--2con per death - mercy command- same as TV guards, you lie unconscious for X ticks upon a blow that would have killed you (if mercy = off, you die) Person that mercied you can loot you, gods of mercy (Bria) protects you otherwise.

--Techniques to gain exp (idealised/ignoring problems such as pfile size)
Exp for quests
Exp for areas/rooms/locations visited (multiplier for explore areas - affected by number in group)
Exp for loring/id'ing new piece of equipment
Exp for skill/spell/commune used successfully (level dependant - yours/it)
Exp for getting better at a skill/spell/commune
Exp for winning a fight. (person dying)
Exp for taking part in a fight (per round? includes friendly sparring)
Exp multiplier per opponent fought (players only or affected by level ...ie 20 kobolds = zilch unless rank 1-2)
Exp for getting a tattoo
Exp for joining a cabal
Exp for grouping with different people (multiplier affected by time grouped with person)

Follow Ups:

• Graham... Nivek 14:26:32 8/29/2000 (0)
• Reply to your post, Mr. Cracker. (inside) Zepachu 12:45:47 8/29/2000 (8)
  • thank you zepachu for ignoring what i asked, the points weren't up for fucking discussion else they dissolve into mindless fucking arguments . post your own fucking ideas or don't post...thats what i requested Graham 13:34:35 8/29/2000 (7)
    • Wow, you're a real fucking jerkoff. Go beat the meat, you need to loosen up. (n/t) Zepachu 14:01:08 8/29/2000 (6)
      • I don't CARE if you think i'm a jerkoff, that can change. You however cannot -grow- a brain Graham 14:07:29 8/29/2000 (5)
        • You, my friend, are a buttmunch. (n/t) Zepachu 14:08:42 8/29/2000 (4)
          • RE: your misplaced post Graham 14:11:08 8/29/2000 (3)
            • Yeah. Basically what that other guy said. I'm done with this thread. *tip* (n/t) Zepachu 14:14:50 8/29/2000 (0)
            • Bah. stop embarassing yourself graham (text) Someone else who doesnt want to get involved 14:13:18 8/29/2000 (1)
              • the whole point of this thread.. Graham 14:17:31 8/29/2000 (0)

Post a Followup