heh... honorable combat.

heh... honorable combat.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Heh. on September 17, 2000 at 21:00:46:

In Reply to: Leika/Honorable Combat posted by Cothurak on September 17, 2000 at 19:52:56:

There should be some changes to honorable combat. Like if you are partially hurt you should be taken away to the arena but you get healed fully and then be attacked AND if you are weaponless you will be given a temporary weapon that is a low average (ie. 15-17). What is honorable about attacking someone that is hurt or weaponless? I have been attacked by this so called honorable combat and i personally think it is bullshit. Anyway these are just some ideas.... Flame on if you want.

Follow Ups:

I do not think you fully understand what does Balgrimnr's mean. Swist 22:25:31 9/17/2000 (4)
- As *much* as I hate wrath, I think forcing Paladins into not using it in honorable combat is senseless. Comes right down to players using stuff against other players that works. n/t Vimal 15:17:22 9/18/2000 (0)
- a riposte or two for you... Shokai(IMM) 00:13:02 9/18/2000 (2)
  - Re: a riposte or two for you... Creodin 08:52:45 9/18/2000 (0)
  - Thank you Shokai.. The First Apostle 08:32:40 9/18/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> There should be some changes to honorable combat. Like if you are partially hurt you should be taken away to the arena but you get healed fully and then be attacked AND if you are weaponless you will be given a temporary weapon that is a low average (ie. 15-17). What is honorable about attacking someone that is hurt or weaponless? I have been attacked by this so called honorable combat and i personally think it is bullshit. Anyway these are just some ideas.... Flame on if you want.