Or you judge a lvl 47 naked mage or a lvl 47 naked dual specialized warrior. I'll take the mage. NT

Or you judge a lvl 47 naked mage or a lvl 47 naked dual specialized warrior. I'll take the mage. NT:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Beladorizid on September 26, 2000 at 14:42:29:

In Reply to: Re: Just wondering: warrior classes vs. magic users posted by Grizzled Old Bear on September 26, 2000 at 13:39:07:

> > Did you notice that very few players play the same amount
> > of warrior classes as they play mage classes. Most people
> > choose only one of these options. I was just wondering why.

> > Here is my own answer: I prefer mages. The reasons are:

> I think your half right and half wrong. A mage can be an aid naked but are not really that big of one. My philosophy behind being a naked warrior is have weapon will travel. As long as u have a weapon of choice or specialization u should do better than most mages with all their spells. EH but iam not saying either of these are useless naked but evan a shitty set of gear helps in some way. U judge a level 20 naked necro or a level 20 specialized naked warrior?

>
> > 1. I just can't play without word of recall and teleport.
> > 2. I think (just personal opinion) that reequipping with
> > a warrior on low ranks (<30) is much more difficult.
> > Naked warrior is worthless, though even naked mage contributes
> > to his group approximately the same bonuses as a mage in
> > most shiny eq.

Follow Ups:

Re: Of course you would so would I a warrior gets his last skill depending on specialization. Mages get more spells and some skill well into their 40's NT Grizzled Old Bear 14:58:28 9/26/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Did you notice that very few players play the same amount > > > of warrior classes as they play mage classes. Most people > > > choose only one of these options. I was just wondering why. > > > Here is my own answer: I prefer mages. The reasons are: > > I think your half right and half wrong. A mage can be an aid naked but are not really that big of one. My philosophy behind being a naked warrior is have weapon will travel. As long as u have a weapon of choice or specialization u should do better than most mages with all their spells. EH but iam not saying either of these are useless naked but evan a shitty set of gear helps in some way. U judge a level 20 naked necro or a level 20 specialized naked warrior? > > > > > > 1. I just can't play without word of recall and teleport. > > > 2. I think (just personal opinion) that reequipping with > > > a warrior on low ranks (<30) is much more difficult. > > > Naked warrior is worthless, though even naked mage contributes > > > to his group approximately the same bonuses as a mage in > > > most shiny eq.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]