Re: Of course you would so would I a warrior gets his last skill depending on specialization. Mages get more spells and some skill well into their 40's NT:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Grizzled Old Bear on September 26, 2000 at 14:58:28:

In Reply to: Or you judge a lvl 47 naked mage or a lvl 47 naked dual specialized warrior. I'll take the mage. NT posted by Beladorizid on September 26, 2000 at 14:42:29:

> > > Did you notice that very few players play the same amount
> > > of warrior classes as they play mage classes. Most people
> > > choose only one of these options. I was just wondering why.

> > > Here is my own answer: I prefer mages. The reasons are:

> > I think your half right and half wrong. A mage can be an aid naked but are not really that big of one. My philosophy behind being a naked warrior is have weapon will travel. As long as u have a weapon of choice or specialization u should do better than most mages with all their spells. EH but iam not saying either of these are useless naked but evan a shitty set of gear helps in some way. U judge a level 20 naked necro or a level 20 specialized naked warrior?

>
> >
> > > 1. I just can't play without word of recall and teleport.
> > > 2. I think (just personal opinion) that reequipping with
> > > a warrior on low ranks (<30) is much more difficult.
> > > Naked warrior is worthless, though even naked mage contributes
> > > to his group approximately the same bonuses as a mage in
> > > most shiny eq.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]