Without busting out the spoon. . .

Without busting out the spoon. . .:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on October 6, 2000 at 12:37:06:

In Reply to: Why not a rager, I was thinking that would be the best choice. why imperial or scarab? posted by newbie again on October 6, 2000 at 12:24:55:

This is the part you need to pay attention to:

> > It's a very equipment-based pick, moreso than almost any other warrior I can think of. It relies on a couple of items to work the way I envision it, but fortunately those items are always in.

Battle warriors, in general, has a much harder time getting and keeping gear than anyone else.

There are also items that Battle can't use.

Follow Ups:

Hmm... The Arcane(VIP) 13:35:06 10/6/2000 (4)
- Re: Hmm... Nepenthe(IMM) 14:45:02 10/6/2000 (1)
  - ...oooOOOSSCHOOOWWWMMMMMMMMMMOOOOooo... eep 18:24:50 10/6/2000 (0)
- I thinking of making mine a rager, think it will still be as "tough" as you say it is? newbie once again... 14:10:24 10/6/2000 (1)
  - Any giant berserker is going to be tough, but it won't be the tough in the way Arcane was planning for it. n/t Shardak 14:48:12 10/6/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> This is the part you need to pay attention to: > > > It's a very equipment-based pick, moreso than almost any other warrior I can think of. It relies on a couple of items to work the way I envision it, but fortunately those items are always in. > Battle warriors, in general, has a much harder time getting and keeping gear than anyone else. > There are also items that Battle can't use.