Why must you prove a moron is a moron, there is a lot less effort to just assume and accept. n/t

Why must you prove a moron is a moron, there is a lot less effort to just assume and accept. n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Arolin on October 7, 2000 at 02:16:30:

In Reply to: Sladin, I'm calling you out. posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on October 6, 2000 at 20:00:35:

> Please name the anti-paladin that you played who got "only" thirty (as in one more than twenty-nine) charges on his/her unholy weapon, as claimed in ../messages/38064.html.

> Being that it would involve thirty PKs where you struck the final blow, all without losing your weapon along the way.... I am skeptical, to understate matters.

> If you are, as they say, "full of crap", please admit it.

Follow Ups:

Is it better to assume and accept or give someone a chance to explain themself? (n.txt) Zepachu 09:51:57 10/7/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Please name the anti-paladin that you played who got "only" thirty (as in one more than twenty-nine) charges on his/her unholy weapon, as claimed in ../messages/38064.html. > > Being that it would involve thirty PKs where you struck the final blow, all without losing your weapon along the way.... I am skeptical, to understate matters. > > If you are, as they say, "full of crap", please admit it.