Is it better to assume and accept or give someone a chance to explain themself? (n.txt)

Is it better to assume and accept or give someone a chance to explain themself? (n.txt):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Zepachu on October 7, 2000 at 09:51:57:

In Reply to: Why must you prove a moron is a moron, there is a lot less effort to just assume and accept. n/t posted by Arolin on October 7, 2000 at 02:16:30:

> > Please name the anti-paladin that you played who got "only" thirty (as in one more than twenty-nine) charges on his/her unholy weapon, as claimed in ../messages/38064.html.

> > Being that it would involve thirty PKs where you struck the final blow, all without losing your weapon along the way.... I am skeptical, to understate matters.

> > If you are, as they say, "full of crap", please admit it.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Please name the anti-paladin that you played who got "only" thirty (as in one more than twenty-nine) charges on his/her unholy weapon, as claimed in ../messages/38064.html. > > > Being that it would involve thirty PKs where you struck the final blow, all without losing your weapon along the way.... I am skeptical, to understate matters. > > > If you are, as they say, "full of crap", please admit it.