Re: Can't agree more. Though for me it is usually faster... And some important text.:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by DwarfingDwarf on October 16, 2000 at 02:14:38:

In Reply to: Can't agree more. Though for me it is usually faster... And some important text. posted by Uli on October 16, 2000 at 00:45:33:

I know for a fact i pk more when i can't roll my new char. For i have no new char to roleplay with so i just log on an old half auto-deleted char, and just have a little fun slaying left right and center.

I'd rather pk for 30mins than role for 3 hours.

Wow, pk for 3 hours over rolling for 3 hours.

Place your bets folks..


> I remember Shokai's post... Something like "you can think
> on your role while your char is rolling". This doesn't
> make sense. I think about my role, write description etc.
> for approximately a week before I start rolling a new char.
> I assume most people do the same.

> I can understand what they are afraid of: they think
> (Shokai specifically said that he thinks so) that this will
> INCREASE THE NUMBER OF LOW-LEVEL PKILLERS. And this is,
> AFAIK, the main reason why the rolling is not changed yet.

> I can understand that, but my understanding doesn't alter
> the fact that stat rolling sucks. I would recommend rolling
> from two (three, four, any number) different hosts :) I think
> I have some notion of global justice, and it wouldn't be unjust
> according to my moral principles :) Don't get caught, however.

Simple fact of life time to pk.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]