the way I see it..

the way I see it..:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Thinhallen on October 24, 2000 at 18:44:35:

In Reply to: Re: However. posted by Quintius on October 24, 2000 at 18:18:10:

..which happens to be a bit different from your view is that the problem really isn't with arbiter mages or warriors, but in the fact that you defend mages. It doesn't have anything to do with the fact that arbiters accepts mages, but more to do with the fact that all arbiters are sworn to protect them. I really don't go out hunting arbiters myself or really getting flagged. I have enough patience to wait, but those ragers that do get flagged sometimes get a bit feistier then they really should. So I see what you're saying, but you're looking at things through your monocle again.

-thinnie

Follow Ups:

Another example of people thinking up half-logical rp to justify what they want...(text) Grallon 02:54:49 10/25/2000 (1)
- Have you ever played a rager? N/T Thinhallen 04:27:01 10/25/2000 (0)
That is absurd.. Eric Prothero 19:31:40 10/24/2000 (2)
- Absurd? Thinhallen 20:48:10 10/24/2000 (1)
  - meant Warrior's post N/T Thinhallen 20:57:40 10/24/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> ..which happens to be a bit different from your view is that the problem really isn't with arbiter mages or warriors, but in the fact that you defend mages. It doesn't have anything to do with the fact that arbiters accepts mages, but more to do with the fact that all arbiters are sworn to protect them. I really don't go out hunting arbiters myself or really getting flagged. I have enough patience to wait, but those ragers that do get flagged sometimes get a bit feistier then they really should. So I see what you're saying, but you're looking at things through your monocle again. > -thinnie