Another example of people thinking up half-logical rp to justify what they want...(text)

Another example of people thinking up half-logical rp to justify what they want...(text) :
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Grallon on October 25, 2000 at 02:54:49:

In Reply to: the way I see it.. posted by Thinhallen on October 24, 2000 at 18:44:35:

The Book protects mages in cities. Alright.

Does the sapling do less protection to mages in the forests? The Sapling allows the mages to hide from you, to ambush you, and to trap you.

This is just as, if not MORE logical than your "reason"(I use the term lightly) for ragers and arbiters butting heads.

If Ragers are going to war with people and things that protect mages, I see a war with Sylvan as valid, if not more, than a war with Arbiters.

Follow Ups:

Have you ever played a rager? N/T Thinhallen 04:27:01 10/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> The Book protects mages in cities. Alright. > Does the sapling do less protection to mages in the forests? The Sapling allows the mages to hide from you, to ambush you, and to trap you. > This is just as, if not MORE logical than your "reason"(I use the term lightly) for ragers and arbiters butting heads. > If Ragers are going to war with people and things that protect mages, I see a war with Sylvan as valid, if not more, than a war with Arbiters.