nah:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Magtograme on October 24, 2000 at 20:56:53:

In Reply to: I disagree posted by Jaldean on October 24, 2000 at 20:24:20:

I have to disagree with that.
While ragers hate weak people - they are there to defend thera from magic -thats the main thing.
That means punishing magi and magic users.
not whacking all the weaklings (if thats what arbiters or anyone else are). Even if ragers think that people should stand on their own feet they should disprove of the protection offered by arbiters, but that isnt a reason to go hunt them.
Arbiters hunting ragers when they have nothing to do... well thats fine (if they have an rp reason to do so), but ragers if they have spare time it should finding another mage to kill.

the lawful thing - ragers dont accept lawful people because again point blank the reason they exist is to kill magi - everywhere - in town or not - bit difficult if you abide by laws?

obvious enemies
sylvan and empire
arbiter and entropy
battle and master
scarab and dawn

the magic/nature thing gets masters and sylvan agressive.
empire will also take on dawn and battle because they wont oath - they should really take on masters too but the empire hasnt been in a state to do that in a hell of a long time.

getting off topic of arbiter/battle so i will end it there

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]