Frankly, if Battle was meant to act like Empire without magic, they would have powers like Empire. . .without magic. (n/t)

Frankly, if Battle was meant to act like Empire without magic, they would have powers like Empire. . .without magic. (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on October 24, 2000 at 22:21:51:

In Reply to: I SO AGREE WITH THIS! Nepenthes sounds more like knights crossed with Barbarians. n/t posted by Shardak on October 24, 2000 at 21:36:59:

That said, I don't entirely disagree with what Cathoir said.

What I really take issue with is when Battle, overtly or covertly, intentionally forces a fight into a raid/defense situation so that they can play the ganging card. Not every Rager does this. Lots do.

The rest can be argued.

Follow Ups:

Ummm, with the single, yet important difference of courage being a requirement. I'd say that would make them, in this case, just a tad different from Imperials. n/t Cathoir 01:40:36 10/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> That said, I don't entirely disagree with what Cathoir said. > What I really take issue with is when Battle, overtly or covertly, intentionally forces a fight into a raid/defense situation so that they can play the ganging card. Not every Rager does this. Lots do. > The rest can be argued.