Ummm, with the single, yet important difference of courage being a requirement. I'd say that would make them, in this case, just a tad different from Imperials. n/t

Ummm, with the single, yet important difference of courage being a requirement. I'd say that would make them, in this case, just a tad different from Imperials. n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Cathoir on October 25, 2000 at 01:40:36:

In Reply to: Frankly, if Battle was meant to act like Empire without magic, they would have powers like Empire. . .without magic. (n/t) posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on October 24, 2000 at 22:21:51:

> That said, I don't entirely disagree with what Cathoir said.

> What I really take issue with is when Battle, overtly or covertly, intentionally forces a fight into a raid/defense situation so that they can play the ganging card. Not every Rager does this. Lots do.

> The rest can be argued.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > That said, I don't entirely disagree with what Cathoir said. > > What I really take issue with is when Battle, overtly or covertly, intentionally forces a fight into a raid/defense situation so that they can play the ganging card. Not every Rager does this. Lots do. > > The rest can be argued.