Re: Places to rank:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Abernyte/Iolanthe on October 25, 2000 at 02:27:16:

In Reply to: Places to rank posted by Imbrogno(VIP) on October 24, 2000 at 14:14:33:

> You're only really screwed if you're a felar ranger, 'cause well they can't go under water. But, if you're a good or neutral ranger and you're not a battlerager then the Pine Forest is lovely ranking(you'll need a muter much like Shadar Logoth).

> There are numerous underwater places to rank when you're a hero and all of these are fine. If you're neutral or evil you also have the storm giants in Kiadana-Rah(especially potent if you're a rager and you have a bard with you).

> Really ranking is not bad if you've explored a lot of characters with a past char. The only time ranking sucks is when you and your groupmates have no idea where some of the high ranking areas are(ie Pine Forest, Kuo-Toa, Sahuagins, etc.)

> Academy/Kobolds
> Forest of Nowhere
> Forbidden Forest(up to about 25 or so)
> Frigid Wastelands(up to about 35-37)
> An underwater places(Kuo, Sahuagin, etc.) OR Kiadana
> Pine Forest once you hit 45th or so(trannie needed)

In my experience with Iolanthe the frigid wastes was not good for my wilderness familiarity, neither was the sahuagin as my skill lags increased after ranking spells in both of them. The whole out of town or 'what is wilderness question?' was always at the back of my mind and when I was re equiping, all be it, not often with Io, I had to get back to forests double quick to put right any out of wilderness travel. They are very limited and it was one of the deciding reason when I deleted.

-----Abernyte

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]