*snickers* Every time I roll up a rager wannabe I get to 20th, feel dirty, and delete. I will play one in the future, but not when there are a bazillion of them 'cause frankly I won't be able to take all of the rager-speak. nt

*snickers* Every time I roll up a rager wannabe I get to 20th, feel dirty, and delete. I will play one in the future, but not when there are a bazillion of them 'cause frankly I won't be able to take all of the rager-speak. nt:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Imbrogno(VIP) on October 25, 2000 at 12:28:21:

In Reply to: Argh. Imbrogno, if you're still playing, *PLEASE* tell me you're playing a future rager leader for perspective. n/t posted by TotW(VIP) on October 25, 2000 at 12:26:43:

> > > > Those laws/Arbiters protect Battle as well, though (in theory). Does that change anything?

> > > Yeesh... I think I've posted this about 90 friggin times. In actuality, there
> > > was a time when Arbiters were dying trying to protect Ragers who were collectively
> > > taking it in the pants from the Masters/Imperials. How do I know? I was one of the damn
> > > arbiters fighting to protect the damn barbarians.

> > >
> > > > Regardless, I think we can agree that a mage of any kind should be a higher priority than an Arbiter, all things being equal?

Follow Ups:

For the Love of God stop rehashing this tired subject until you have done so N/T Thinhallen 15:29:00 10/25/2000 (4)
- I agree, 150%. It's more than a little odd that Quintius of all people is instructing ragers on how they 'should act' (small quote): TotW(VIP) 15:51:47 10/25/2000 (3)
  - Hrm Quintius 20:35:41 10/25/2000 (0)
  - $0.02 U.S. currency Nepenthe(IMM) 16:24:16 10/25/2000 (1)
    - He was neutral/lawful. The gnome muter Lord during mine and Quintius' time. Can't think of the name. nt Imbrogno(VIP) 17:50:53 10/25/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > > Those laws/Arbiters protect Battle as well, though (in theory). Does that change anything? > > > > Yeesh... I think I've posted this about 90 friggin times. In actuality, there > > > > was a time when Arbiters were dying trying to protect Ragers who were collectively > > > > taking it in the pants from the Masters/Imperials. How do I know? I was one of the damn > > > > arbiters fighting to protect the damn barbarians. > > > > > > > > > Regardless, I think we can agree that a mage of any kind should be a higher priority than an Arbiter, all things being equal?