Re: I'll answer!:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Waigerits(VIP) on November 22, 2000 at 08:00:58:

In Reply to: Re: I'll answer! posted by Nivek on November 22, 2000 at 07:41:43:

>
> > The thing is the mage was going to word. Hell NONE of three sylvans who weren't tripping even insected him. Where is CF going to? Is Challen right about player quality degradation?

>
> Well, they DID win. And he might have gotten away even with a dispel.

My point was, if you want to kill someone (sylvans should
want to kill a dark-elf, not just pound on him
so he flees and doesn't interfere in the raid) you probably
want to make sure you do all to kill the other person.
Which these sylvans didn't.

> The above Challen comment kind of reminds me of 'White Men Can't Jump.' Some poeple would rather look good and lose then look bad and win. I'm not saying that this means Challen or anyone else in particular for that matter. But if their tactics worked, how can you say the quality of their actions has degraded?

When you let luck/other persons's connection speed/whatever else
decide for you, it means your actions aren't perfect. If sylvans
do such gaping mistakes as not insecting someone they want to
kill, I say, their quality is degradating no matter whether they
win or not.

> Nivek, who would have gotten away too, if it wasn't for those pesky kids and that dog.

Heh.

P.S. I hope I made my point clear, this is discussion leads to nowhere.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]