Re: I'll answer!

Re: I'll answer!:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nivek on November 22, 2000 at 07:41:43:

In Reply to: Re: I'll answer! posted by Waigerits(VIP) on November 22, 2000 at 06:59:29:

> The thing is the mage was going to word. Hell NONE of three sylvans who weren't tripping even insected him. Where is CF going to? Is Challen right about player quality degradation?

Well, they DID win. And he might have gotten away even with a dispel. The above Challen comment kind of reminds me of 'White Men Can't Jump.' Some poeple would rather look good and lose then look bad and win. I'm not saying that this means Challen or anyone else in particular for that matter. But if their tactics worked, how can you say the quality of their actions has degraded?

Nivek, who would have gotten away too, if it wasn't for those pesky kids and that dog.

Follow Ups:

Re: I'll answer! Waigerits(VIP) 08:00:58 11/22/2000 (1)
- hmmm Lucktey 13:33:41 11/22/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > The thing is the mage was going to word. Hell NONE of three sylvans who weren't tripping even insected him. Where is CF going to? Is Challen right about player quality degradation? > > Well, they DID win. And he might have gotten away even with a dispel. The above Challen comment kind of reminds me of 'White Men Can't Jump.' Some poeple would rather look good and lose then look bad and win. I'm not saying that this means Challen or anyone else in particular for that matter. But if their tactics worked, how can you say the quality of their actions has degraded? > Nivek, who would have gotten away too, if it wasn't for those pesky kids and that dog.