Re: I'll answer!:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Waigerits(VIP) on November 22, 2000 at 06:59:29:

In Reply to: I'll answer! posted by Quinthen(VIP) on November 22, 2000 at 06:36:15:

> > Umm, this really sucks. Btw, dunno why Rhycyn used fatigue
> > (*roll*) instead of dispel.

> If I were Rhycyn, I'd do the same thing. That fight is going to be over immediately either way. The mage flees, or gets pounded to dust in a few rounds. You know the mage is trying to flee, no doubt about it. Pound him as hard as you can, immediately, and hope he dies. Which he did.

The thing is the mage was going to word. Hell NONE of three sylvans who weren't tripping even insected him. Where is CF going to? Is Challen right about player quality degradation?

> Dispel is absolutely fantastic for a prolonged battle, but certain situations simply demand you break out the whooping stick and nothing else.

Dispelling invoker shields helps a lot to increase damage your group is doing. Maybe he didn't have shields (which is quite strange) but shaman couldn't know about it, he didn't even try dispel. Also I am quite sure demonfire does more damage than fatigue (ok maybe it won't work for a good aligned shaman vs a dark-elf but do you really think shaman should use fatigue when four sylvans pound the poor drow?). If you don't want him to run far, use energy drain or plague for -mv.

> By the way, good to hear from you again, Waigerits!

Good to hear from you again Quinthen. My invoker always liked your black sanc :)


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]