Aha! But...

Aha! But...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Quinthen(VIP) on November 22, 2000 at 09:23:55:

In Reply to: Re: I'll answer! posted by Waigerits(VIP) on November 22, 2000 at 06:59:29:

> The thing is the mage was going to word. Hell NONE of three sylvans who weren't tripping even insected him. Where is CF going to? Is Challen right about player quality degradation?

I still think dispel is wrong for that situation. However, not insecting is foolish, quite true.

> Dispelling invoker shields helps a lot to increase damage your group is doing

Dispelling invoker shields is iffy at best. I say insect him, then pound the bastard. No need to energy drain... if he's insected, with two summoners right there... he's not going anywhere anyway. Before you disagree, remember, I'm always right!

Follow Ups:

Ok... well... maybe... Waigerits(VIP) 09:49:24 11/22/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > The thing is the mage was going to word. Hell NONE of three sylvans who weren't tripping even insected him. Where is CF going to? Is Challen right about player quality degradation? > I still think dispel is wrong for that situation. However, not insecting is foolish, quite true. > > Dispelling invoker shields helps a lot to increase damage your group is doing > Dispelling invoker shields is iffy at best. I say insect him, then pound the bastard. No need to energy drain... if he's insected, with two summoners right there... he's not going anywhere anyway. Before you disagree, remember, I'm always right!